Wed 25 Feb 2009
Eyes on the Prize
Posted by Susan under Parental Watch Issues , Illinois Homeschool News , Mental Health Screening , Universal PreschoolThe Early Ed Watch Blog has a series - Illinois & Chicago-Hint of What’s to Come? I’ve had this thought often since last November concerning our country’s future.
These articles revolve around the possibilities stemming from the early education program (Preschool for All) initiated by Illinois’ impeached governor Blago, along with lots of help from the Illinois legislators. Consider the players and their national recognition (notorious and not) and your interest might perk up.
February 17: All Eyes on Illinois…
February 19: Duncan’s Record in Chicago
Today: Q-and-A with Barbara Bowman
I should mention that Illinois is flat out broke; approaching a $9 billion deficit. But of course, the federal government is too. But it appears that we should hope extending compulsory attendance would suddenly turn education successes around for institutional schools. Many of these kids (the prospective dropouts and pushouts and college attendees taking remedial classes) will become miraculously learned and inspired so that they can go from school to work and pay off our huge debts we’re inflicting on these future generations. President Obama promised last night that a “complete and competitive education” will start: "From the day they are born to the day they begin a career”.
From All Eyes on Illinois:
Now that President Obama has signed the stimulus legislation into law, early education supporters can shift their speculative energy toward what the administration’s broader early childhood agenda will look like. During the 2008 campaign, Obama promised a substantial, $10 billion investment in early education programs, including new "Early Learning Challenge Grants" to states, but provided few details about what those programs would look like in practice.
A closer look at early education programs in Illinois and Chicago might provide some useful hints. Both President Obama and Arne Duncan, his secretary of education, hail from the Windy City, and both played a role in expanding early education programs in Illinois and Chicago. It seems reasonable to expect that their experiences will inform their federal policy agenda for early education.
There are a lot of reasons to be impressed by early education in Illinois. Not only is it one of the few states working towards universal pre-k for 4-year olds by 2011, it is the only state pursuing universal pre-k for 3-year olds too.
Indeed, Kwame Raoul, handpicked to replace President Obama’s 13th District senatorial position, introduced legislation in 2005 where he was Wishing for 3 year olds:
In testifying at the Senate Education Committee, Senator Raoul said this in his last attempt: “I wish this bill was lowering the age to 3!” He also leaves little to the imagination with the following quote, as he stated in the Chicago Sun-Times in 2006. (This article is in the archives.):
Ready or not? Should kids be in school at 5?: Kindergarten? Preschool? Parents wrestle with decision
Author: Maudlyne Ihejirika The Chicago Sun-Times Date: July 30, 2006
“The home-schooling lobby also fought the bill sponsored by state Sen. Kwame Raoul (D-Chicago). It squeaked out of the Senate but died in the House. A 2003 effort by state Rep. Mary Flowers (D-Chicago) saw a similar fate. “Logically, it doesn’t even make sense to talk about preschool for all if we don’t say you have to have your kids in kindergarten,” Raoul said.”
Raoul had a lot of help from people like Jerry Steimer, who headed a group called Voices for IL Children. I found their name offensive under their agenda and wrote a letter to the editor in 2006. The Bloomington Pantagraph gave the letter this heading:
Doesn’t want ‘Voices’ speaking for her
Stermer is now our new Governor’s chief of staff. From the Bloomington Pantagraph this month:
But some Republican lawmakers already questioned whether Stermer was the right pick for the job with the state in the midst of a financial meltdown. “I like and respect Jerry Stermer’s tremendous advocacy on behalf of Illinois children. As a former chief of staff to Gov. Edgar, I was a little surprised considering the state’s fiscal condition that Gov. Quinn picked a perpetual advocate of additional spending rather than a managerial type,’’ said Republican state Sen. Kirk Dillard.
From Illinois & Chicago-Hint of What’s to Come?:
For the third installment in our series on Illinois and Chicago, Early Ed Watch talked to Barbara T. Bowman, chief early childhood education officer for the Chicago Public Schools. Bowman’s experience runs deep. She co-founded the Erikson Institute and has served as president of the NAEYC.
Bowman co-founded the Erikson Institute with child psychologist Maria Piers and social worker Lorraine Wallach, along with the support of businessman Irving B. Harris. One product of the Erikson Institute is the Irving B. Harris Infant Mental Health Certificate Program. Another is this: "Erikson now has a $2.4 million grant from the Illinois Department of Children and Family Services to provide infant mental health screenings to all children, parents, and foster parents in the foster care system. “Irving would have been so proud of that,” Stott {Erikson administrator] says." Who would have known Toni home perms could have such an effect.
Indeed, there is a bit of controversy about need for universal mental health screenings for children and families, related to concerns with the profitability of pharmaceutical companies and other interested parties. (Gardasil is one example.) Illinois was also innovative in passing a Children’s Mental Health Act in 2003. The Harris Foundation, Voices for IL Children and other interested "job creation" (government) promoters were instrumental in getting this Act passed with initial requirements for universal mental health screenings for all children and all pregnant and new mothers. (This plan follows the federal Bush-created New Freedom Commisssion on Mental Health report that states "Both children and adults will be screened for mental illnesses during their routine physical exams". In the state’s scramble for new federal grants, Page 17 gives you an idea of Illinois’ "Prevention" with: " Periodic developmental screens • Voluntary home visits • Parenting education and support services • Social and emotional development programs and curricula for community services and schools". ) That’s just a start if you read on.
It appears that Bowman has a bright future:
Early childhood advocates say she will probably be named to the Presidential Early Learning Council that President Obama has pledged to create. At the moment, she said, she is a consultant to the U.S. Department of Education, "making recommendations to Arne Duncan on how to improve the department’s emphasis on early childhood."
… the Chicago public school system strives to provide free, high-quality preschool opportunities for all 3- and 4-year-old children from low-income families. The system allows families to choose from five different types of preschools, including some in childcare centers run by outside agencies. The lead teacher in each preschool classroom must have a bachelor’s degree and teacher certification from the state of Illinois.
Certification and a bachelor’s degree is of supreme importance, along with a "trained infant specialist"(s) for community agencies providing childcare with state aid. The ‘successes’ of the public institutions will soon overtake the private entities.
Where is our country heading? The bureaucrats have been at this for a long time. Family advocates in Illinois know that government oversight proponents have been keeping their eye on the prize for some time. Groups such as Voices for Illinois Children and our governmental bureaucracies are paid to protect their jobs and build that sustained cocoon of “job creation”. This has been a long standing bi-partisan effort.
From the Chicago Tribune in May of 2006:
Jerry Stermer, president of Voices for Illinois Children, said, "Lawmakers in both parties, in both chambers, were concerned that we expand in the most thoughtful way, providing services to at-risk children first."
He said no one expected the plan to serve all children at once.
"We believe we’re on the road to universal preschool, as we had anticipated being."
Who’s going to stop them?
“Kids Themselves Aren’t The Same”
Mandatory Mental Health Screenings: Are We Crazy?
February 25th, 2009 at 9:51 am
Last night when I heard the comments about “from the day they are born”, I knew you’d have something to say about it. You didn’t let me down!
February 26th, 2009 at 9:40 am
Interesting information, Susan. It certainly is a lot to think about.
At the other end of the spectrum, I just learned this a.m. that the elderly were unknowingly given quite a blow by Bush last September when he enacted a rule that makes it hard for families or lawyers to gather information in abuse cases in nursing homes. http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=washingtonstory&sid=aGc2PNd3vVL s
I don’t like big government, but neither do I like big corporations having control over us that has been granted by the government. I want big government to stay out of those areas of my life that do not involve state or federal dollars, but areas that do, where my tax dollars are given to businesses such as nursing homes or schools, I expect wise spending and accountability. Not favors and assurances that the system will be gamed via new rules so millions can be made on the back of innocent citizens.
So many powerful folks have learned to ‘game’ the system that the whole picture seems to be corrupt on all sides. Seems like the one side is claiming to support freedom while gaming it and the other is gaming it while claiming to protect the people. Still, my hope is that there are some decent legislators who will fight for constituents, but they aren’t going to do it unless they hear from us.
February 26th, 2009 at 12:51 pm
It’s crazy what powers are granted that take away our controls of family.
I’m reading a book right now by Joel Salatin (chicken farmer extraordinaire) titled “Everything I want to do is illegal”.
And the book isn’t about smokin’ dope.
It’s about his trials and tribulations as a non-factory farmer. Trying to have his neighbors sell their products (handmade soap, crafts, etc) in his little farm shop, for instance. The govt. won’t allow it, unless he jumps thru endless hoops. Bureaucrats don’t understand community.
The govt. has turned into our own worst enemy.
Your hope is my hope. I know there are decent legislators out there, but they do need to hear from constituents.
February 26th, 2009 at 4:07 pm
I’d like to read that book! This reminds me of the situation with our local food co-op that was visited by the Swat team in December.
If I want to participate with a co-op and share a grass-fed steer that it isn’t FDA approved etc, I should be allowed to do that. But these days it seems that any type of big business, whether it is a corporation or a branch of government seems to be doing all they can to protect their top-heavy interests, even if it means crushing small guys who are hurting no one.
There is an excellent post at the Complete Patient this week, “Which States Have the Most Illnesses from Raw Milk? Hint: This Is Not a Trick Question”
http://www.thecompletepatient.com/journal/2009/2/24/which-states-have- the-most-illnesses-from-raw-milk-hint-this.html
It seems that just like homeschooling, data gets skewed everywhere these days.